top of page
Andrew Riggs

The Case for Nuclear Energy in Powering Next-Generation Computing

A man wearing an "I HEART COAL" shirt stands in front of a nuclear reactor contemplating the future of energy production

The technology industry faces a critical challenge: powering the unprecedented computing demands of artificial intelligence and machine learning workloads. Data centers alone are projected to consume 12% of total US power output by 2030, creating an urgent need for reliable, clean energy sources. The sector's significant investment in renewable energy has helped, but the growing intensity of AI workloads demands a more comprehensive approach.


As a provider of power-hungry, high-performance computing infrastructure, The Cloud Minders is keenly aware of its contribution to the increasing demand for power. Global energy consumption has increased by roughly 50% since 2000 and is expected to rise another 20% by 2040. Meanwhile, the International Energy Agency (IEA) reports that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius requires a 45% reduction in global CO₂ emissions by 2030. Nuclear energy, with its minimal carbon footprint and reliable output, presents a unique opportunity to address both the computing industry's growing energy demands and our environmental responsibilities.


This analysis examines the role of nuclear energy in sustainable computing infrastructure through several critical lenses:

  • Its advantages over fossil fuels in emissions and efficiency

  • Recent advances in nuclear safety and technology

  • Economic viability and stability

  • Waste management solutions

  • Global adoption and future potential



Nuclear Energy vs. Fossil Fuels: A Comparison of Emissions and Efficiency


Fossil fuels account for 70% of the world's electricity and generate over 30% of global CO₂ emissions. Nuclear power offers a dramatically different profile: over its entire life cycle, nuclear energy emits roughly 12 grams of CO₂ per kilowatt-hour (kWh), compared to coal's 820 grams and natural gas's 490 grams. Nuclear plants operate at full capacity 92% of the time, versus 57% for natural gas, 48% for coal, and 35% for wind. This reliability ensures consistent energy supply, even when weather conditions limit solar or wind power generation.



Advancements in Nuclear Safety and Technology


Safety concerns around nuclear energy have historically hindered its development, but recent advancements have led to significant improvements in reactor safety and waste management. The newest Generation III+ reactors incorporate advanced safety systems that drastically reduce accident risks. Small modular reactors (SMRs), designed for enhanced safety and flexibility, are expected to come online by 2030, offering a direct replacement for aging fossil-fuel plants. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) data confirms nuclear's safety record: nuclear energy has a fatality rate of just 0.03 deaths per terawatt-hour (TWh), compared to 24.62 for coal and 2.82 for natural gas.



Cost-Effectiveness and Economic Stability


Nuclear energy's economic profile challenges common assumptions about renewable energy costs. While initial construction costs are high, nuclear plants operate for up to 60 years with low maintenance expenses—around $0.04 per kWh compared to coal's $0.06 and gas's $0.05, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Nuclear facilities also drive significant economic growth: each plant employs over 700 full-time workers, generates approximately $470 million in local goods and services, and contributes $67 million in annual wages to their communities.



Addressing Nuclear Waste Management


A common criticism of nuclear energy revolves around the management of nuclear waste. However, the entire waste output of the U.S. nuclear power industry over 60 years would fit within a single football field stacked 10 meters high. Deep geological storage, along with advancing reprocessing and recycling technologies, continues to minimize environmental impact while ensuring safe, long-term containment.



Nuclear Energy in the Global Energy Transition


Nuclear energy currently provides about 10% of the world's electricity and 29% of global low-carbon electricity, second only to hydropower. Despite this, global investment in nuclear energy lags behind other renewables. To meet the 2050 net-zero emissions target, the Int


ernational Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) recommends that nuclear generation capacity needs to more than double by mid-century.

Countries like France have already demonstrated the viability of nuclear energy on a large scale, with nearly 70% of France's electricity coming from nuclear. This reliance on nuclear power has contributed to France having one of the lowest carbon footprints in the industrialized world, at about 4.1 metric tons of CO₂ per capita compared to the United States' 15 metric tons.



Conclusion: Powering Sustainable Computing Through Nuclear Energy


The future of high-performance computing depends on our ability to meet extraordinary power demands while honoring environmental commitments. Nuclear energy provides the reliability, sustainability, and scalability that next-generation computing infrastructure requires. As a provider of high-performance computing infrastructure, The Cloud Minders recognizes that nuclear power's combination of consistent output and minimal carbon footprint aligns perfectly with the technical demands of AI workloads and our industry's environmental responsibilities.

bottom of page